🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a ban on deploying national guard in Portland, Oregon, following a recent legal decision.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on this week that it would reexamine the case concerning the executive power with an larger panel of eleven justices. The court also vacated a earlier decision from a three-judge panel that had sided with the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This legal directive represents the most recent development in a long-running court case over whether the former president has the authority and valid reason to send state military units in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in uncertainty since late September when the mobilization attempt was initiated in response to months of protests.

Conflicting Arguments

The federal government has argued that federal officials at the ICE facility in south Portland were facing threats, while city and state officials maintain that municipal police have command of the situation.

Contrary to characterizations of the city as “war ravaged”, residents have been sharing videos of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and organizing events such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in Portland enacted two legal injunctions this period – one preventing the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the use of any national guard troops in the state, after attempts to evade the initial injunction by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On Monday, the appeals court had put the first ruling on hold – allowing command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the subsequent injunction remained in place, blocking the physical sending of the forces.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard by the full court – with all decisions under consideration together – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This decision demonstrates that facts are important and that the judicial system are striving to hold this administration accountable. The founding document limits the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” said the state attorney general in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot send the military into American urban areas without cause. We will continue protecting state legislation, values, and sovereignty as this case progresses and our legal battle continues in the judicial system.”