🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a increasing group of nations are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that phones and networks are "taking away our youngsters' youth". Legislation could be passed soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to pass a proposal lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a similar move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised guardians to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors without parental consent is provided. While it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the step does not create binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a good starting point," said a leading European lawmaker behind the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "based on strong data".

Previously, support built behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. However, the government pledged to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. One foundation established by the loved ones of a young person who died after viewing dangerous social media material suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to design products and services that are secure and suitable for young users," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, regulation is primarily happening at the local level amid national inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills demanding adult authorization for minors to create social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from various individuals to copy the Australian path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Outside of the West, additional states are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies strike a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve user protection.

While this international discussion continues, the steps of this nation and others demonstrate that governments around the world are less and less prepared to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.